Filtek P60

Claim 1:
Gonçalves FS, Leal CD, Bueno AC, Freitas AB, Moreira AN, Magalhães CS. A double-blind randomized clinical trial of a silorane-based resin composite in class 2 restorations: 18-month follow-up. Am J Dent. 2013 Apr;26(2):93-8.

de Veras B, Menezes G, Barros H, Rocha M, Monteiro A, Pedrosa M, Pompeu J, Prado Júnior R, da Silva C. Clinical performance of class I occlusal composite resin restorations: a multicenter double-blinded randomized clinical trial. Braz Dent Sci 2018; 21: 288.

Kupietzky A, Atia Joachim D, Tal E, Moskovitz M. Long-term clinical performance of heat-cured high-viscosity glass ionomer class II restorations versus resin-based composites in primary molars: a randomized comparison trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2019 Oct;20(5):451-456.

Torres CR, Borges AB, Goncalves SE, Pucci CR, de Araujo MA, Barcellos DC. Clinical evaluation of two packable resin-based composite restorations: a three-year report. Gen Dent. 2010 Jul-Aug;58(4):338-43.

Timur V. Melkumyan, Angela D. Dadamova, Surayo Sh. Sheralieva, Nuritdin Kh. Kamilov, Fatima Yu. Daurova. Treatment of Class II Caries Lesions with Application of Packable and Conventional Resin Composites: Clinical and Experimental Study. International Journal of Biomedicine. 2020;10(1):66-69.

Pazinatto FB, Gionordoli Neto R, Wang L, Mondelli J, Mondelli RF, Navarro MF. 56-month clinical performance of Class I and II resin composite restorations. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012 May-Jun;20(3):323-8.

Gianordoli Neto R, Santiago SL, Mendonça JS, Passos VF, Lauris JR, Navarro MF. One year clinical evaluation of two different types of composite resins in posterior teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 May 1;9(4):26-33.

Zhang Yanlin,Ma Jingzhi,Peng Zhixiang et al. Clinical Evaluation of Different Dental MateriaIs for Restoration of Molar with Heavy Defects. J Huazhong Univ Sci Tech 2002; 31: 206.

Loguercio AD, Reis A, Hernandez PA, Macedo RP, Busato AL. 3-Year clinical evaluation of posterior packable composite resin restorations. J Oral Rehabil. 2006 Feb;33(2):144-51.

Yazici AR, Ustunkol I, Ozgunaltay G, Dayangac B. Three-year clinical evaluation of different restorative resins in class I restorations. Oper Dent. 2014 May-Jun;39(3):248-55.

de Souza FB, Guimarães RP, Silva CH. A clinical evaluation of packable and microhybrid resin composite restorations: one-year report. Quintessence Int. 2005 Jan;36(1):41-8.

Claim 5:

Karaarslan ES, Ertas E, Bulucu B. Clinical evaluation of direct composite restorations and inlays: Results at 12 months. J Res Dent 2014;2:70-7.

Claims 2 - 4, 6:

none found

Clinical indication(s) / Claim(s)
Verbatim per manufacturer's Instructions-for-use (IFU) sheet

Claim 1: Direct posterior restorations (including occlusal surfaces)
Claim 2: Direct anterior restorations
Claim 3: Core build-ups
Claim 4: Splinting
Claim 5: Indirect restorations / inlays, onlays
Claim 6: Indirect restorations / veneers

Clinical evidence supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)

Clinical evidence not supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)

Clinical evidence not related to the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)

CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0

CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0

CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0

CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 1 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0

CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0

CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0

CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0